(TP-DeSantis’ “promise” is actual “Incitement of Genocide,” and “Complicity in Genocide,” as established by the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal. Putting DeSantis (and Trump) and his Israeli Kahanist ideologue allies, the National Conservatives, in an “unbroken ideological and legal chain" back to those Nuremberg defendants! With all collectively sharing the political/legal worldview of Carl Schmitt; the “Friend-Enemy Distinction,” as ordering all “social relations.” As National Conservative/Trumpite (West Coast Straussianism) ideologue and benefactor Peter Thiel made so clear in his celebration of Schmittian/Straussian polititical “thought,” “ideas,” that is. As does his alignment with Israeli Kahanists, looking at this objectively. And includes those others complicit in Genocide, from the Democratic Party’s Goldwater/Scoop Jackson wing, which is now the mainstream Democrat position. Which almost keeps up in the race to "Radical Right Militarism” with the Republicans, which together, comprise the ideology of the “War Party.”
That is, in applying principles of the International Relations theory of “Constructivism,” which I adhere to mostly, at least to its theory which holds:
"Central to constructivism are the notions that ideas matter, and that agents are socially constructed (rather than given).[3][6][15][16]
"Constructivist research is focused both on causal explanations for phenomena, as well as analyses of how things are constituted.[6]In the study of national security, the emphasis is on the conditioning that culture and identity exert on security policies and related behaviors. Identities are necessary in order to ensure at least some minimal level of predictability and order. The object of the constructivist discourse can be conceived as the arrival, a fundamental factor in the field of international relations, of the recent debate on epistemology, the sociology of knowledge, the agent/structure relationship, and the ontological status of social facts.[17]
"The notion that international relations are not only affected by power politics, but also by ideas, is shared by writers who describe themselves as constructivist theorists.”
In other words, the ideas, “ideology,” of governing factions, and their coalition partners, and rivals too, matter. Which is so self-evident that those who ignore that in any analysis, may become complicit themselves in the crimes which may follow. With that “analysis” rightly beginning in our own country when we have major parties lining themselves up with those committing genocide, and cheering genocide on! Or, as another case would show; what level of dereliction would an Intelligence/IR analysis beginning in 1929 be which failed to take note of the ideology of the more correctly called “National Conservative German Militarist-Fascist Party” coalition be?)
Ron DeSantis Promises to Support “Mass Removal” of Palestinians in Gaza
The Florida governor made a shocking vow in the latest Republican debate.
Ron DeSantis said Wednesday that he would not stop Israel from forcibly removing Palestinians from Gaza if he is elected president.
The Republican primary debate featured just DeSantis and Nikki Haley, and saw a shocking return to actual policy discussion. At one point, moderator Jake Tapper asked DeSantis if he supported the mass removal of Palestinians.
“I am not going to tell [Israel] to do that,” DeSantis said. “But if they make the calculation that to avert a second Holocaust, they need to do that,” then he wouldn’t stop them.
The word for the mass expulsion of an ethnic group is ethnic cleansing.
DeSantis also said he did not believe in a two-state solution to the conflict between Israel and Gaza, instead accusing “Palestinian Arabs” of refusing to recognize the existence of Israel. The Palestinian Authority does, in fact, recognize Israel.
Israel, however, only seems open to a two-state solution if the second state is on an entirely different continent. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s far-right coalition has reportedly been secretly speaking with the Democratic Republic of Congo about resettling thousands of Palestinians in the African nation.
Netanyahu and his allies have repeatedly floated the idea of forcibly removing Palestinians, but the idea has been vehemently rejected by the international community.
Israeli officials, however, have made it increasingly clear in recent days that their plan is to completely eliminate Palestine. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said last week that a way to solve the war was to “encourage the voluntary migration of Gaza’s residents to countries that will agree to take in the refugees.”
Separately, National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir told reporters that the war was an “opportunity to concentrate on encouraging the migration of the residents of Gaza.”
Biden Official Refuses to Answer Whether Israel Cutting Off Water Is a War Crime
(TP- Kirby as a retired Admiral must be seen as a “National Security Conservative,” as they were and are called. The “War Party Ideology,” apart from any “economics” beliefs.)
Joshua Roberts/Getty Images
White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby refused to answer whether Israel cutting off Palestinians’ access to water is a war crime.
During a press conference on Wednesday, Kirby was asked about the upcoming International Court of Justice case accusing Israel of committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.
South Africa brought the charges against Israel and, as proof of its case, submitted an 84-page filing in December documenting Israeli war crimes as well as statements by various Israeli officials that it says proves “genocidal intent.” The ICJ will hear its first public hearing on the case on Thursday.
Kirby—and the Biden administration writ large—have completely dismissed the case thus far. Kirby last week called it “meritless, counterproductive, and completely without any basis in fact whatsoever.”
On Wednesday, however, Kirby was again asked about whether he had read the actual filing against Israel.
“You dismissed a few days ago the case brought by South Africa against Israel at the ICJ. Did you read the indictment, and if you did, do you believe that cutting off water, electricity, and fuel from a civilian population does not constitute a war crime by itself?”
“Yes I read the indictment,” Kirby replied angrily. “And as I said, we stand by what we said about this. We find it without merit. We find it counterproductive. And I’ll leave it there.”
South Africa’s filing links to several reports of Israel cutting off water, electricity, fuel, and food supplies—all of which has been documented extensively in the media.
In December, Unicef Executive Director Catherine Russell warned that clean water is so hard to find that “children in Gaza have barely a drop to drink.” Public health officials have repeatedly raised “grave concerns” over the lack of clean water and the outbreak of infectious diseases, including waterborne illnesses like cholera and typhoid.
One in every 100 people in Gaza has been killed since October 7, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry in Ramallah. That’s nearly 23,000 people—and that’s the most conservative estimate. The nonprofit Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor puts thedeath toll at nearly 30,000.
Fox News Offers Bonkers Proof of Why Taylor Swift Is a Psyop
Conservatives are once again up in arms over Taylor Swift.
(TP-it’s declared “PsyOp,” or “Cognitive War,” by the Right, when something works against their extreme-right agenda. Meaning anything which “obstructs” their own “Cognitive Warfare Campaigns!)
Gotham/GC Images
Taylor Swift
Taylor Swift, 12-time Grammy Award winner, Spotify’s most streamed artist in 2023, and TimePerson of the Year, can add another line to her résumé: Democratic Party psyop. At least according to Fox News.
Fox host Jesse Watters, and frequent Fox contributor Stuart Kaplan, spent Tuesday evening musing that the Biden administration may have been behind Swift’s recent post encouraging people to register to vote.
“When she posted the link to the Vote.org, like hundreds of thousands of young Taylor Swift fans all of a sudden registered to vote,” Watters began. “I wonder who got to her, from the White House or from wherever?”
Kaplan went on to suggest that the administration had sought out Swift, “whether with [her] knowledge or without [her] knowledge,” to lend her 279 million Instagram followers for a “covert” get-out-the-vote initiative.
Watters, of course, offered no pushback on the psyops narrative.
For what it’s worth, 35,000 new voters registered on Vote.org as a result of Swift’s Instagram post in September.
It is hardly forbidden knowledge that the Democratic Party has made celebrity endorsements of its candidates part of its campaigning strategy. The 2020 and 2016 Democratic National Conventions were, to mixed reviews, studded with the stars of today and yesteryear. But Swift, whose forays into activism have been mostly limited to anodyne denunciations of Tennessee Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn and the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision overturning abortion rights, and support for Black Lives Matter and LGBTQ+ rights, has not been outspoken in her support for Joe Biden ahead of the 2024 election.
This, of course, has not stopped conservatives like Watters and Kaplan from indulging their obsession with Swift and their suspicion that her popularity among young people betrays, at best, a symptom of national decadence and impending decline and, at worst, a government conspiracy.
This is not even the first time Swift has been accused of participating in psyops; the far-right provocateur Jack Posobiec previously linked her to a “2024 voter operation for Democrats on abortion rights.”
Swift is only the latest celebrity to incur the wrath of the right. It once famously harnessed outrage at Colin Kaepernick and made it into a foundational block of its brand of reaction. But the obsession with Swift, about as inoffensive a cultural figure as exists in the United States, may just be the strangest.
Watters closed the segment by lamenting that he “now [knows] a lot more about Taylor Swift than [he] ever wanted to know,” but it’s clear that the right’s Swift-hatred is a product of its own making. As 2024 approaches, it’s yet to be seen whether this fixation will reap electoral rewards.
ADL Officially Admits It Counts Pro-Palestine Activism as Antisemitic
The Anti-Defamation League has abandoned all pretense of tracking antisemitism properly in its 2023 report.
TP-as did Trump and the Trump administration, and the Republican Party as a whole; declaring so in Executive Orders, laws, and proposed laws, as I shared recently.
Probal Rashid/LightRocket/Getty Images
A demonstrator holds a sign that reads “Jews for Palestine” during a protest near the White House on December 2.
The Anti-Defamation League has made a startling confession: It is now including pro-Palestine marches in its count of antisemitic incidents in the United States.
The ADL released its annual antisemitism report on Wednesday, announcing that there were a stunning 3,283 such incidents in 2023. That’s a 361 percent increase compared to the previous year, according to the organization, which noted the “American Jewish community is facing a threat level that’s now unprecedented in modern history.”
The organization also stated that two-thirds of the total incidents could be “directly related to the Israel-Hamas war.”
The ADL report was widely covered by mainstream outlets like CNN, NBC, and Axios, which simply took the organization’s word for the gigantic increase without actually checking the data behind the claim.
Not all media outlets fumbled the ball, however. As The Forward first noted, there’s one big problem with the numbers: The ADL admits in its own press release that it includes pro-Palestine rallies in its list of antisemitic incidents, even if these featured no overt hostility toward Jewish people. Any anti-Israel or anti-Zionist chants are enough for the ADL’s new definition of antisemitism.
The report’s full list of antisemitic incidents isn’t public, but under the new definition, it could even count anti-Israel protests by Jewish activists as antisemitic. Many Jewish Americans have been at the forefront of the pro-Palestine protests over the last three months.
The 2023 report includes a whopping 1,317 rallies in its list of antisemitic incidents, with no clear distinction between whether the rallies included antisemitic rhetoric or anti-Zionist chants and without regard for whether there were Jewish organizers or participants involved. In other words, the underlying data in support of this assertion is likely to be considerably inflated.
Antisemitism is a real, and growing, problem—especially in the United States. But the ADL isn’t helping anyone when it defines a bomb threat at a synagogue and a Students for Justice in Palestine rally as equally antisemitic.
The problems with ADL’s reporting methods have been obvious for some time to anyone paying close attention. As Eric Alterman wrote for The New Republic, the ADL has, since its founding, repeatedly changed its counting method—and then followed these periodic rejiggerings with reports asserting massive increases in antisemitic incidents. Even more troubling, the organization habitually fails to make distinctions between the various antisemitic incidents it is tracking. Graffiti found on the walls of a college dorm gets lumped together with more deadly tragedies, such as the 2018 shooting at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh.
The organization’s reporting has taken an even greater turn for the worse under chief executive Jonathan Greenblatt. In 2015, he began his leadership at the organization with a speech that made virtually no mention of the dangers of white Christian nationalism. And on Israel, Greenblatt in 2022 firmly announced: “Anti-Zionism is antisemitism, full stop.”
In October, an ADL researcher resigned over Greenblatt’s condemnation of Jewish Americans protesting Israel’s war on Gaza. But the next month, Greenblatt only doubled down on his position, when he said that pro-Palestine activism has “clarified and confirmed that fanatical anti-Zionism from the hard left is as dangerous to the Jewish community as rabid white supremacy from the extreme right.”
Along the way, Greenblatt has demonstrated a hesitance to criticize one of the more appalling antisemites in public life: Elon Musk. The two men’s strange alliance has drawn criticism from Greenblatt’s predecessor, Abe Foxman.
All that to say, the ADL’s new counting method isn’t a huge surprise. But it sure is disappointing to see so many media outlets take the organization’s word at face value.
